In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, the recent departure of Pat Gelsinger from Intel has raised many eyebrowsGelsinger’s ambitious vision, dubbed IDM 2.0, aimed to reshape Intel into a leading designing firm while also establishing it as a major player in contract chip manufacturingRegrettably, the execution of this vision did not unfold as intended, leaving Intel stuck with an underperforming balance sheet, unfinished manufacturing facilities, and an uncertain future in its foundry ambitions.

The excitement that once surrounded Gelsinger’s return to Intel in 2021 has gradually transformed into a sense of trepidationUpon his arrival, a wave of hope surged among industry experts and investors that Intel could reclaim its stature as America’s semiconductor champion, potentially rivalling companies like TSMC and SamsungToday, as Gelsinger departs, many are questioning whether Intel will now abandon its hop of becoming a formidable contract manufacturer, a dream that could allow it to scale operations and service a growing demand for chips across various industries.

Analysts like Vivek Arya from Bank of America believe the lack of tangible progress under Gelsinger’s IDM 2.0 strategy made his exit unsurprising

With Intel's focus seemingly shifting toward product development rather than the foundry ambitions Gelsinger pushed for, the company finds itself at a crossroadsPost-Gelsinger, some analysts speculate that Intel is contemplating a split of its product line and foundry operations, a move that could provide each entity with the operational independence necessary for growth.

The Intel board's recent public statement on December 2 expressed gratitude for Gelsinger's role in revitalizing the company's chip manufacturing effortsFrank Yeary, a board member, emphasized the need to center product groups in Intel's future endeavorsYet, amidst this shift, the fundamental question remains: are the foundry dreams of Intel resilient enough to survive this turn of events?

Certainly, Intel's fate in the foundry business is intricately tied to government investmentIn November, the U.SDepartment of Commerce finalized an allocation of $7.86 billion for Intel under the CHIPS Act—a crucial piece of legislation designed to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing

This funding could provide a financial cushion, especially as Intel grapples with dwindling revenues and strives to fulfill its $100 billion commitment toward its foundry operations.

However, the federal support comes with stringent strings attachedIf Intel opts to separate its foundry operation into a separate legal entity, it must retain at least 50.1% ownershipAny significant divestment would be against the stipulations of the CHIPS Act, posing further complications for the company if it seeks to alter its operational structure.

To further complicate Intel's potential divestiture, the establishment of a new entity would be encumbered by the stipulation that prevents third parties from owning more than 35% of Intel’s foundry business unless Intel retains its position as the largest shareholderThe path to division or IPO is riddled with hurdles that may not be easily overcome.

Nonetheless, some industry insiders have hinted at the possibility that a transaction might not be entirely off the table

The regulatory framework could allow for mechanisms that facilitate ownership transfers among beneficiaries of the CHIPS ActFor instance, Polar Semiconductor, the first beneficiary of CHIPS funding, underwent ownership changes while still adhering to the federal rules by ensuring that the original parent company retained a minority interest.

Yet, the biggest challenge that looms over Intel's contract manufacturing dream is the hunt for potential buyersWith Intel investing billions in new semiconductor fabs across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon, any prospective acquirer must possess ample capital and extensive experience in operating advanced wafer fabrication facilities.

Given that many American firms have shifted towards fabless operations, scooping out significant opportunities for foundry services, the likelihood of suitable domestic buyers remains slimIn a departure from the fabless trend, Intel's unique position lies in its simultaneous operation of chip design and manufacturing—a distinct competitive advantage that may not be easily replicated.

Intel has frequently been heralded as "America’s champion" due to its unique ability to produce critical advanced chips domestically, yet it now finds itself scrutinizing its future in a landscape increasingly driven by Asian powerhouses like TSMC and Samsung, both of whom have robust financial resources and keen interest in capturing the U.S

alefox

market.

While Intel has yet to generate substantial revenue from its foundry services, the rising interest in advanced packaging solutions suggests that potential opportunities could arise, particularly from the field of artificial intelligence chip makersAdvanced packaging technologies have emerged as pivotal battlegrounds for companies like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung, enabling higher performance and fortifying AI computations as traditional transistor scaling becomes increasingly arduous.

Moreover, Intel's foundry services are not perceived as immediate threats to TSMC's dominance, given the complexities and demand placed on production capabilities by the current AI chip boomMike Orme, an analyst from GlobalData, noted that TSMC is grappling with capacity constraints in its packaging business—a crucial aspect in meeting burgeoning AI requirements—while stating that Intel’s competencies in packaging could render its foundry assets appealing.

Intel’s recent partnership with Amkor to bring advanced chip packaging back to the U.S

reflects efforts to enhance its capabilities in this growing sector, but barriers remainExperts suggest that national security considerations will complicate any acquisition negotiations involving TSMC or Samsung, due to the sensitivity surrounding semiconductor production.

In addition to the allocative support from the CHIPS Act, Intel has secured a $3 billion contract with the Department of Defense to manufacture secure chips for governmental use, reinforcing the strategic importance of its operations on national security grounds.

The political climate is also tenuous, as the newly elected President continues to criticize the semiconductor funding framework, advocating for tariffs to incentivize production domestically insteadIf policy shifts occur, greater flexibility for Intel’s internal structuring may emergeHowever, the overarching sentiment remains that the strategic significance of its foundry business to national security, coupled with bipartisan support for bolstering local semiconductor manufacturing, almost guarantees foreign acquisition remains out of reach.

Analysts express a resolute belief that neither TSMC nor Samsung will be granted access to Intel's foundry capacities, solidifying the complex battleground ahead

With Intel's uncertain trajectory amplified by investor discontent driving its stock down nearly 60% within the year, the pressure intensifies following its recent removal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average—a milestone that dragged it further from the competitive spotlight.

Estimates predict 2023 will likely culminate in upward-adjusted operational losses for Intel’s foundry business amounting to approximately $7 billion, with Gelsinger previously forecasting that new fabs might not contribute substantial earnings until at least 2027. As a beacon of hope, Intel’s interim CEO and CFO, Dave Zinsner, recently asserted that the core strategic intentions remain unchanged, touting ambitions to become a top-tier supplier of cutting-edge silicon within the Western market.

However, he emphasized that the success of the foundry operation will also depend heavily on the success of Intel’s own product groups, many of which are manufactured in-house

According to current confidences within the company, there appears to be a pivot towards a phase of sustainable profitabilityStill, commitment towards the foundry sector remains vital, indicating a potentially tumultuous journey ahead for Intel as it continues to navigate an industry landscape dominated by the likes of TSMC, while working to assert its place once more as a leader.

The ongoing challenges faced by Intel, especially in seeking to stabilize its standing in the contract manufacturing domain, could serve to further elevate its leading rival, TSMC, who stands solidified in global supremacy within this sectorMacquarie Capital’s head of Asian technology research, Damian Thong, speculated that the transition in Intel’s leadership might lead to ambiguity regarding capital expenditure plans in the shorter term, hinting at the possibility of reduced investment commitments, particularly outside the U.S